Gospel According to Matthew
1.Define the tidings “gospel” and realize the indelicate capacitys in the New Testament that fit in this nature.
2.Identify the structural principles that Matthew uses to arrange the esthetic in his gospel.
3.Identify the “synoptic gospels”, the signification of the tidings, and their intention in the New Testament.
4.Why influence an attendant influence use the literal labels of BCE and CE instead of BC and AD?
5.Identify the hearers for which Matthew is writing his gospel and why this is considerable for the reader to comprehend.
6.Identify, delay a divergent in for each, three training strategies that Jesus uses in Matthew’s Gospel.
7.What is the significance of Jeremiah 31:31-34 to our intelligence of the New Covenant?
8.Define the tidings “epistle” realize its intention in the New Testament
9.Who was Tertius and why is he considerable to our intelligence of the mood lower which Paul’s Letter to the Romans was written.
10.Identify the structural principles that Paul uses to arrange the esthetic in his Letter to the Romans.
11.What was the significance of Romans 1:17 to Martin Luther?
12.Identify the three stages to Paul’s rule of soteriology (i.e. atonement)?
13.Identify indelicate defining characteristics of apocalyptic scholarship as they direct to Revelation.
14.Identify the blessings delay which the capacity of Revelation opens.
15. Realize the warnings delay which the capacity of Revelation concludes, and extend reasons why these may own been included.
16.Where was Patmos and what is its significance to our intelligence of the mood lower which the visions in Revelation were current?
17.Who was Domitian and why do we scarcity to comprehend about him when studying Revelation?
18.What does it moderation to overcome Revelation an eschatological capacity?
19.Identify the structural principles that John uses to arrange the esthetic in Revelation?
20.Explain some of the stylistic as well-mannered-mannered as thematic reasons that Revelation is a harmonious seal to the Bible.
21.Comment on the Romans’ perspective on the first-century Christians.