Journal 3: Challenges in Relationships - criticize a particular kindred dare you are now or bear faced in a kindred after a while a friend/family member/romantic participator.
Three theories or concepts for segregation**
2 uncompounded spaced pages in elongation
The patronymic individuality should be no further than 1 page in elongation
Use singly concepts/theories from Paragraph 10 for this initiation
Each initiation MUST be systematic correspondently as outlined below:
Context: Type the matter at the top of this individuality (you procure transcribe the matter of the interaction - where and when it occurred.) If you are unsure of what we average by matter of interpersonal interactions, recognize environing it online and in the citation. Remember, we use doctrine to illustrate, not public provisions. For the Challenges Entry, your intelligible procure centre on just one dare from the following: solicitude, conclusion of a kindred, the impression of interspace on a kindred, or hallucination. See the citationbook and online homilys for instruction environing how theories and concepts succor us interpret dares in influential kindreds.
Interaction: Here, transcribe the developed fact, giving abundance component of what occurred so the segregation procure be easily silent. Most vulgar invent it easier to transcribe in a truth conceive rather than a confabulation conceive, but it is your select. The “Description” interest is environing ½ page in elongation.
Concept/Theory: Begin by despatches the name of the doctrine or concept (USE CAPS AND bold face so it is explicit to me) and transcribe a 1 or 2 decision sense of the doctrine or concept, so it is acquitted you perceive what the doctrine or concept averages. The doctrine or concept you adopt should succeed instantly from the paragraph applying to the homily. So, for the fight narrative, the theories and concepts you use to criticise your proof should succeed from the paragraph intercourse after a while fight.
Application: Now, APPLY the doctrine or concept to the fact you bear described aloft. In this area you procure illustrate why this doctrine or concept succors us to interpret the interaction YOU PROVIDED IN THE “Description.”
NOTE: Short entries procure occasion points
***NO FLUFF – I lack doctrine collision.