I scarcity rectify answers please  QUESTION 3 Check each of the subjoined that employ to oligopolies.? MR incurvation accomplish smash into two segments consequently of the kinked claim incurvation firms accomplish be systematic of numerous worth changes and extensiond two-of-a-trade in manage to execute an expected return Firms that claim a extensive consummate siege favor there is neither legislation administer nor efficiency QUESTION 4 Check all the subjoined that are penny ? .Oligopolies bear a entiretyly buoyant claim incurvation Oligopolies bear an buoyant claim aloft the controlling worth Oligopolies bear an inbuoyant claim underneath the controlling worth the controlling oligopoly worth is at the intersection of the buoyant and inbuoyant portions of the kinked claim incurvation QUESTION 9 Check each of the subjoined that are characteristics of monopolies.? P = AR = MR = D economies of lamina ownership of immanent  resourcesselling an same fruit legal and other barriers to minute worth takers worth setters QUESTION 11 Check all of the subjoined that enumerate the buoyantity of claim for monopolistic producers? .the incomes of consumers claim for the singular fruits sold by monopolies the sum of competing strongs selling resembling fruits customer cognizance of the resemblingity or singularness for the fruit or favor. QUESTION 12 Check each of the subjoined that characterizes oligopolies.? ownership of raw materials by one strong legislation immureions may be on the sum of producers advertising is not important economies of lamina immure the sum of producers singular fruits ownership of raw materials by a few strongs QUESTION 17 Check all of the subjoined that employ to oligopolies? .after a while an inbuoyant claim and a worth dismiss, entirety produce accomplish dismiss. the claim incurvation is inbuoyant aloft the controlling worth consequently other strongs do not thrive the worth extension and buyers alienation from the inferior-priced competitors strong that raises its worth aloft the controlling worth has a dismiss in entirety produce the claim underneath the controlling worth is inbuoyant consequently strongs accomplish be solid to thrive a worth dismiss  and accordingly, no only strong accomplish favor from inferior worths. QUESTION 32 Check each of the subjoined that may be in oligopolies and monopolistic two-of-a-trade when compared to real two-of-a-trade.? increased efficiency higher costs less efficiency further output than real two-of-a-trade inferior output than real two-of-a-trade inferior costs to consumers QUESTION 34 Check each of the subjoined that may carry to disingenuous two-of-a-trade after a whilein privilege? .dumping economies of substance established reciprocation agreements ownership of immanent resources QUESTION 42 Check each of the subjoined that represent Monopolistic Competition? .same fruits fruit differentiation non-worth two-of-a-trade significant barriers to minute and exit a little (handfull) of competing strongs many strongs competing worth taking QUESTION 43 Check each of the subjoined that results in prouder costs for monopolistic competitors? .further customer favors a singular atmosphere varied consumer choices QUESTION 46 Which of the 4 bargain structures bear at smallest some bargain government? (repress all that employ) real two-of-a-trade monopolistic two-of-a-trade oligopoly monopoly QUESTION 47 Farming fruits frequently fit into which of the 4 bargain structures? Monopoly Monopolistic two-of-a-trade oligopoly Pure two-of-a-trade QUESTION 50 (Check each of the rectify answers) Game scheme suggests that strongs in oligopoly:? would rebuff subsidy a low worth consequently other strongs would competition the worth and their usage would no longer be. would rebuff subsidy a proud worth consequently fewer buyers would alienation from that strong should prefer to assist after a while other sellers in maintaining the worth after a whilein a "moderate" zone accomplish court to "gouge" their customers by charging the proudest practicable worths