reading assignment

  1) Answer any THREE of  the nine questions listed beneath. You may extract three questions from the  same provision or three questions from two unanalogous provisions. It's  entirely up to you. These three supports must entertain a reserve of 100 tone each. Anyunnaturalness near gain product in a action of ZERO externally the possibility of a perform-up support.  PLEASE MAKE SURE TO SUBMIT 3 SEPARATE POSTS: DO NOT ANSWER MORE THAN ONE QUESTION IN A SINGLE POST.  QUESTIONS: Chapter 4: Epicurus 1.  Although Epicurus is a hedonist, he is obviously unanalogous to mean  hedonism. Can you confront additional arguments for or athwart the plea of  mean hedonism? Is it not terribly “ judgmental” for us to arrogation that  some pleasures are “higher” or “ lower” than others? Shouldn’t we proportioned  tolerate and confirm differences of conviction in this area? Or does it perform  further reason to evidence that there is a consistent hierarchy of pleasures and  pains? 2.  Epicurus believes that dread of venial visitation is the highest  source of dread and solicitude. Do you conform delay this assessment? Why or  why not? 3.  Epicurus evidences that the best and happiest way of animation is one in which  one seeks to sate on the most basic, consistent and certain desires.  Do you conform that embracing such a animation of frankness (no grandeur, glory,  luxury or lucre) is truly further subsidiary to enjoyment and quiet  than up-hill to “keep up delay the Joneses”? If you said “yes,” then are  you already initiative measures to subsist in the Epicurean style? Chapter 5: St. Thomas Aquinas 4.  How would St. Thomas protect himself (if, verily, such a excuse is  possible) athwart the inculpate of substance “homophobic” (a engagement that did not  exist in his span, but which is fairly base today)? Would you confront his  excuse superficial? Why or why not? 5.  If one is not at all godly, is it tranquil likely to charm St.  Thomas’ consistent law principle seriously? Could it tranquil be relied upon  as a pilot to living well-behaved? Explain. Chapter 6: Thomas Hobbes 6. Do you contemplate that substance self-interested is a bad unnaturalness? If so, why? If not, why not? 7.  Compare Christ’s Golden Rule delay Hobbes’ Golden Rule. Which do you  contemplate is further talented in getting inhabitants to comply the laws, and why? 8.  Do you conform delay Hobbes that our consistent state is one of  lawlessness and vehemence? How do you contemplate you would beentertain if you knew  you could get separate delay whatever you wanted to? Do we solely comply the laws  out of dread of price? Unit2.docx