Plaintiff worked for Defendant, a manufacturing community whose manufacturing mode compromised the use of two vats of molten fluent maintained at 800 degrees centigrade, into which metal accommodation were immersed. Covers made of asbestos and perpetuate were balance-and-above the vat, to be put on as needed to fix passion. A worker knocked one of the meets into the molten fluent and the meet sank outside causing a splash. Following a few minutes, the molten fluent erupted and injured the Plaintiff who was established nearby.
There following experiments implied that a junction of asbestos and perpetuate would endure a chemical transmute at airs balance 500 degrees centigrade, so that hydrogen and oxygen in the representative would connect to frame h20. The soak at this air would decline to steam and consequence an explosion or eruption
The Plaintiff sued the Defendant and the test affect held in boon of Plaintiff, finding carelessness on the part of the worker in knocking the meet into the vat.
Did the test affect aim the lawful determination by usurpation in boon of the Plaintiff? Hint: Think environing direct action.