Assignment 1

   Assignment 1: Incongruous Approaches to Heterogeneousness Issues (1865–1925) History 105: Due Week 3 and rate 120 points (Dr. Stansbury)  Submission deadline: 9am Eastern occasion; Monday coming, October 21 In Assignment 1, we ask you to pick-out one of three theme choices scheduleed under on the theme of heterogeneousness then use the Communication Guide located in Blackboard to transcribe a short brochure on the theme. Each theme explores two incongruous vestibulees to heterogeneousness during the 60-year determination behind the Civil War (1865–1925). The dynamic among the two vestibulees succeed accept a abysmal contact on our narrative then—and now. As you qualify and brainstorm effects for your brochure, earliest interpret and reconsideration what our Schultz quotationbook ass on the theme. Then, deem the other rises scheduleed after a while each theme under. It is relevant that you reconsideration these rises carefully owing your brochure should use a poverty of three rises from the schedule under. Besides this command quibble and the Communication Guide, be believing to reconsideration the other helps (documents or video) supposing by your zealot. For instruction on the SWS format, see the “Strayer Communication Standards” tab on the inferior left of your Blackboard series shell.  TOPIC CHOICE ONE: Empowering African Americans—Two Strategies Here you succeed centre on the vestibulees of Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Du Bois. Other glorious spectrys and surely incongruous organizations succeed behove deal-out of your examination. Washington’s illustrious 1895 “Atlanta Compromise” oration (labeled such after by critics) sets the mood. One dominion as virtues, problems and successes associated after a while twain strategies. You dominion see elements of each in strategies of after leaders and connected issues equable today. Sources: Schultz, p. 340–2, 400–1, 404–5. See http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/39/; and see http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/40 TOPIC CHOICE TWO: Getting Women the Vote—Two Strategies Here you succeed centre on the vestibulees of two organizations and some spectrys associated after a while each. These are the NAWSA (National American Woman Suffrage Association; after the League of Women Voters) and the NWP (National Women’s Party). You succeed fulfill the strategic vestibule and key delineateers in each as they pursued the vile goal of getting women the upupright to signification. One dominion as virtues, problems and successes associated after a while twain strategies. You dominion see elements of each in strategies of after leaders and connected issues equable today. Sources: Schultz, p. 364–366. Besides see https://www.womenshistory.org/education-resources/biographies/carrie-chapman-catt on one of the leaders of the NAWSA; on the NWP’s Alice Paul, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GDe4DkZN2A ; and https://americanhistory.si.edu/blog/2012/05/alice-paul-champion-of-woman-suffrage.html.   [Topic Choice Three on instant page] p. 2 TOPIC CHOICE THREE: Immigration—Two Abutting Approaches and Views Here you succeed centre on two abutting aims of colonization and its contact on American refinement and estate. These are conspicuous in the recent 1800s and coming 1900s, in a occasion wshort colonization was skyrocketing for a desire determination---but telling restrictions would succeed into delineate. One aim is represented by lines of a illustrious anthem on the dishonorable of the Statue of Liberty. The other ass its fix in laws restricting colonization. One dominion as virtues, problems and successes associated after a while one or twain strategies. You dominion see elements of each in strategies of after leaders and connected issues equable today. Sources: Schultz, p. 334–5, 348–9, 358–9, 408–9. Look for equablets and issues approve the space of Ellis Island, the smooth pot effect, the Chinese Exclusion Act, and the National Origins Act. Besides see the anthem on the Statue of Liberty dishonorable: https://www.nps.gov/stli/learn/historyculture/colossus.htm . And see http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_9781133309888/unprotected/ps/chinese_exclusion_act.htm .  --------------------------  Your assignment must supervene these formatting capabilitys: Use the Strayer      Writing Standards (SWS).      The format is incongruous than other formats approve APA. Please capture a force      to reconsideration the SWS documentation for details. Be typed, inclose spaced among lines, using Times New Roman font, Calibri,      Arial, or Courier (magnitude 10, 11, or 12), after a while one-inch margins on all      sides; citations and rises must supervene SWS format. You must accept a      Sources schedule at the end; each rise scheduleed must besides be cited in the mass      of the brochure after a while an in-quotation citation. Check after a while your zealot for      any fixed commands.  The preferred      file software is Microsoft Acenumerate (deal-out of MS-Office). Alternatively, a novice can use      Windows’ WordPad (not NotePad) or OpenOffice. (Please do not confer-upon files in .pdf format or Apple’s Pages or google      docs.)  Include a as page containing the distinction of the      assignment, the novice’s spectry, the zealot’s spectry, the series distinction,      and the continuance. The as page and the Sources page are not comprised in the      required assignment elongation. · The mass of the brochure should be five paragraphs and a aggregate of 500-to-800 opinion in elongation. The 500 poverty is firm; you truly accept not adequately patent palpable the brochure if hither than that. The 800 apex is a incompact guideline. The mass of the brochure is to be inclose-spaced. Typically, if you supervene these commands, the mass of your brochure succeed be 2-1/2 to 3-1/2 pages in elongation—add a page for your distinction page and another for your rises schedule and that then gets to 4-1/2-to 5/1/2. But, the elongation capability is evaluated by acenumerate enumerate.  The brochure must be confer-uponted (uploaded and fixed) in the series shell supposing online. The biased series literature outcomes associated after a while this assignment are: Discuss the crops, racial and collective      policies, and laws from 1865 to the 1920s superveneing the end of compulsion. --------------------------------------------------------------------------  Grading for this assignment succeed be dishonorabled on confutation peculiarity, logic/organization of the brochure, and diction and communication skills, using the superveneing rubric. [grading rubric is on the instant 2 pages under] p. 3 Grading for this assignment succeed be dishonorabled on confutation peculiarity, logic/organization of the brochure, and diction and communication skills, using the superveneing rubric. [rubric is on p. 3-4 short]    Points:   120 Assignment 1: Incongruous Approaches to   Diversity Issues (1865-1925)   Criteria Exemplary 100% A Proficient 85% B Fair 75% C Meets Poverty Expectations 65% D Unacceptable 0% F   1. Introduction: Fulfill the two incongruous vestibulees that you succeed   discuss. Reconfer-upon what you succeed as in the brochure.  Weight: 10% Thoroughly and clcoming introduced   your brochure by fulfilling the two   incongruous vestibulees that you succeed sift-canvass and describing what you succeed as   in the brochure.  Satisfactorily introduced your brochure   by fulfilling the two incongruous   approaches that you succeed sift-canvass and describing what you succeed as in the   paper.  Partially introduced your brochure   by fulfilling the two incongruous   approaches that you succeed sift-canvass and describing what you succeed as in the   paper.  Insufficiently introduced your brochure   by fulfilling the two incongruous   approaches that you succeed sift-canvass and describing what you succeed as in the   paper Poor or no importation. Did not   fulfill the two incongruous vestibulees that you succeed sift-canvass. Did not reconfer-upon   what you succeed as in the brochure.    2. Narrative and Issues: reconfer-upon the crop of the vestibulees,   any key persons or equablets, and any “success.”  Weight: 30% Thoroughly and coherently representd   the crop of the vestibulees, any key persons or equablets, and any   “success.” Satisfactorily representd the   crop of the vestibulees, any key persons or equablets, and any “success.” Partially representd the crop   of the vestibulees, any key persons or equablets, and any “success.” Insufficiently representd the   crop of the vestibulees, any key persons or equablets, and any “success.” Did not confer-upon or inaccurately   vivid the crop of the vestibulees, any key persons or equablets, and   any “success.”   3. Comparison: evaluate what you see as the strengths and   weaknesses of each aim, and the contact of each in that determination of narrative. Weight: 15% Thoroughly and clcoming evaluated   what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of each aim, and the contact of   each in that determination of narrative. Used   persuasive forced or palpable examples.  Satisfactorily evaluated what you   see as the strengths and weaknesses of each aim, and the contact of each in   that determination of narrative. Partially evaluated what you   see as the strengths and weaknesses of each aim, and the contact of each in   that determination of narrative. Insufficiently evaluated what you   see as the strengths and weaknesses of each aim, and the contact of each in   that determination of narrative. Did not confer-upon   or inaccurately evaluated what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of   each aim, and the contact of each in that determination of narrative.   4. Conclusion: fulfill homogeneous   issues or vestibulees that patent palpable after, and any homogeneous issues today.  Weight: 15% Thoroughly and effectively   verified homogeneous issues or vestibulees that patent palpable after, and any homogeneous   issues today. Satisfactorily   verified homogeneous issues or vestibulees that patent palpable after, and any homogeneous   issues today. Partially   verified homogeneous issues or vestibulees that patent palpable after, and any homogeneous   issues today. Insufficiently   verified homogeneous issues or vestibulees that patent palpable after, and any homogeneous   issues today. Did not confer-upon   or inaccurately verified homogeneous issues or vestibulees that patent palpable after,   and any homogeneous issues today.    5. Used the MINIMUM of three rises,   drawing from the schedule supposing. The assort quotation is one of the rises used.   Sources are scheduleed at the end and matching in-quotation citations are used. Weight: 10% Meets at meanest the poverty estimate of   required rises; all rises tall peculiarity choices. Sources are scheduleed at the   end and besides cited in the mass of the brochure. Solid investigation is palpable. Meets poverty estimate of required   sources; most rises succeed from the schedule supposing. Does not as the required estimate of   sources; some rises deficient peculiarity choices or not from the schedule supposing. Does not as the required estimate of   sources; Insufficient on the relation schedule or in-quotation citations.  No rises supposing.   6. Communication and Presentation:  Used good-tempered-tempered expression. Presentation shows   clarity, conclude, and exact thinking after a while right communication mechanics. SWS   format is used for relation entries, in-quotation citations, brochure layout, and   organization. Instructions superveneed.  Weight: 20% 0–2 errors. 3–4 errors. 5–6 errors. 7–8 errors. More than 8 errors confer-upon. ------------------------------------------------