WEEK V

Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000184 EndHTML:0000024631 StartFragment:0000021368 EndFragment:0000024591 SourceURL:file:///C:\Users\VCPENA\Documents\Unit%20V%20Problem%20Solving.docx              <!--  /* Font Definitions */  @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:1; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-format:other; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536859905 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;}  /* Style Definitions */  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0in; margin-right:0in; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; margin-bottom:10.0pt; line-height:115%;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->     Unit V Collection Solving   In the ionic combinations LiF, NaCl, KBr, and RbI, the measured cation–anion separations are 2.01 Ã… (Li–F), 2.82 Ã… (Na-Cl), 3.30 Ã… (K–Br), and 3.67 Ã… (Rb–I), honorively.     1. Predict the cation-anion separation of each ionic combination over using the values of ionic radii consecrated in Figure 7.7 on page 257 in the textbook. To admit liberal trustworthiness, you must appearance how you predicted the separation for each monad by providing a gradational explanation for each monad. The explanation for each monad is rate 8 points; thus, a whole of 32 whole points is likely for this doubt.    CHM 1030, General Chemistry I 3    2. Rate the disagreement among the tentatively measured ion-ion separations granted at the foundation of this assignment and the ones you entertain predicted in collection 1. You must appearance how you adapted the disagreement for each monad by providing a gradational explanation for each monad to get liberal trustworthiness (6 points for each monad; whole likely points for this minority is 24 points). Showy that we entertain an correctness of 0.04Ã… in the bulk, content declare for each monad if your predicted ion-ion separations are considerate or not considerate delay honor to their tentative ion-ion separations (2 points for each monad; whole likely points for this minority is 12 points). A whole of 32 whole points is likely for this doubt.    3. What estimates of the cation-anion separation would you succeed for these indelicate combinations using their fettering minute radii? (Note: these values are besides in Figure 7.7 but are contrariant from the ionic radii.) For each of the indelicate combinations, rate the disagreement among the predicted ionic fetter separation, which you adapted in collection 1, and predicted minute fetter separations you adapted in this collection. To admit liberal trustworthiness, you must appearance how you adapted the disagreement for each monad by providing a stride-by stride explanation for each monad (6 points for each monad; whole likely points for this minority is 24 points). Again, showy that we entertain an correctness of 0.04Ã… in the bulk, declare for each monad if your foreshowings are short or further considerate using the minute radii foreshowing arrangement; teach your apology (2 points for each monad; whole points likely for this minority is 8 points). Using your conversance of minute and ionic radii trends in the intermittent board, why authority one foreshowing arrangement be further alienate to use than the other in undoubtful monads (rate 4 points)? A whole of 36 points is likely for this set of doubts.