Civil Liberties/Rights and Supreme Court Cases


The chart belowneath inventorys indivisible equitables of Americans. Note: this inventory is NOT consumptive.

Select ONE of the equitables and alike circumstances from the inventory belowneath. Follow  the connect for circumstance of your rare in the equitablehand shaft to glean over  about it. Then perceive the intermission of the instructions below the chart.  

Individual equitable
(Annotations from Senate.gov website)

  

Location in Constitution

  

Real World Case

   

Establishes devout insubservience by prohibiting the avow of an professional or restricted church or category.

  

1st Amendment

  

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/supreme-court-sides-with-christian-baker-who-denied-cake-to-same-sex-couple (Links to an apparent position.)

Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

   

Free harangue and playing comcompress are protected, although they can be  limited for reasons of contumely, obscenity, and undoubtful forms of avow  censorship, specially during wartime.

  

1st Amendment

  

Snyder v. Phelps
Protesting at soldierlike funerals (Links to an apparent position.)  

   

The insubservience of nock and salutation besides covers marching, picketing and pamphleteering.

  

1st Amendment

  

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/supreme-court-voids-35-foot-abortion-clinic-buffer (Links to an apparent position.)

McCullen v. Coakley

   

Protects an indivisibles’ equitable to occupy firearms uncompromised to any advantage in a militia.

  

2nd Amendment

  

https://video.kqed.org/video/supreme-court-enforces-ban-on-straw-purchase-of-guns-1410213834/ (Links to an apparent position.) 

Abramski v. United States

   

Applying to arrests and to questes of beings, homes, and other  private places, this forfeiture requires a engage, thereby placing a  neutral party between the police and the denizen.

  

4th Amendment

  

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/what-the-supreme-courts-cellphone-location-data-ruling-could-mean-for-your-digital-privacy (Links to an apparent position.) 

Carpenter v. United States

     

When the government seizes attribute to use in the general share, it must pay the proprietor impartial treasure.

  

5th Amendment

  

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/supreme-court-seems-divided-property-rights-dispute (Links to an apparent position.)

Murr v. Wisconsin

     

Neither surety nor forfeiture for a wrong are to be unreasonably strict.

  

8th Amendment

  

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/law-jan-june05-death_penalty_03-01 (Links to an apparent position.)

Roper v. Simmons

Establishes that all denizens are entitled to "equal shelter of the laws.”    

14th Amendment


https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/must-employers-make-special-considerations-pregnant-workers (Links to an apparent position.) 

Young v. United Parcel Service


INSTRUCTIONS:

Now quest for the actual archives of this Supreme Court Circumstance at https://www.oyez.org (Links to an apparent position.) 

1. Perceive and refer this information:

a. Title of the circumstance

b. Date of the circumstance

c. Petitioner and Respondent

d. The termination of the circumstance  

e.Do you coincide or discoincide delay the termination of the circumstance? Explain your rejoinder. 


2. Quest Oyez or google/quest engine to perceive another SC circumstance that  besides interprets a alike legal inquiry. Briefly embody  that circumstance, and say whether you regard there is a free warrant  established touching circumstances having to do delay this equitable or categoryion of  the Constitution.