PHI 208 WEEK 4 DISCUSSION 1


 

Week 4 - Argument 1

No unlearn replies.11 rejoinder.

Your primal argument continuity is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you feel until Day 7 (Monday) to acceptance to your classmates. Your action conquer cogitate twain the peculiarity of your primal support and the profoundness of your retorts. Refer to the Argument Forum Grading Rubric below the Settings icon over for direction on how your argument conquer be evaluated.

Week 4 Argument [WLOs: 1, 2, 3] [CLOs: 3, 4, 5]<

This week our deep argument conquer nucleus on illustrateing and evaluating the plea of salubrity ethics as discussed in Chapter 5 of the passagebook. Your schoolmaster conquer be choosing the argument interrogation and supporting it as the primary support in the deep argument forum. The exactments for the argument this week conceive the following:

  • You must arise supporting by Day 3 (Thursday).
  • You must support a partiality of disgusting disconnected supports on at meanest three disconnected days (e.g., Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday, or Thursday, Friday, and Sunday, or Thursday, Saturday, and Monday, etc.).
  • The completion generously signal calculate for all of your supports, calculateed concomitantly, should be at meanest 600 signals, not including references.
  • You must acceptance all the interrogations in the responsive and illusion declaration of having learn the resources that are exactd to total the argument rightly (such as by using notes, referring to unfair points made in the passage, etc.).
  • In command to fulfil the supporting exactments for the week, supports must be made by Day 7 (Monday); supports made following Day 7 are grateful but conquer not calculate inside the exactments.
  • Be knowing to rejoinder to your classmates and schoolmaster. You are encouraged to learn supports your schoolmaster makes (equal if they are not in retort to your own support) and rejoinder to those as a way of examining the ideas in main profoundness.
  • All supportings (including replies to peers) are expected to be provision out, prooflearn for habitual, real, and spelling achievement, and to walk the argument in an clever and meaningful way (i.e., byword celebrity relish “I veritably enjoyed what you had to say” conquer not calculate). You are so encouraged to do delayout discovery and note from that as courteous.

For further knowledge, content learn the Frequently Asked QuestionsPreview the document.

This argument conquer be assessed on a 10-point flake and is worth 4% of your last action.

Search entries or composer Filter replies by unreadUnlearn   Collapse replies Expand replies Subscribe ReplyReply to Deep Discussion

  • COLLAPSE SUBDISCUSSIONMichael LarsonMichael Larson
    Aug 26, 2018Local: Aug 26 at 8pm<br>Course: Aug 26 at 6pmManage Argument EntryDiscussion 1: Salubrity and Teleology
    To enknowing that your primal support starts its own rare continuity, do not rejoinder to this support.  Instead, content click the "Reply" converge over this support.
    Please learn the public argument exactments over, as courteous as the announcements illustrateing the argument exactments and acceptanceing the most regularly asked interrogations.  If you are calm?} unknowing environing how to receipts delay the argument, content rejoinder to one of those announcements or adjunction your schoolmaster.

    Please carefully learn and opine environing the generous responsive precedently soothing your primary support. This argument conquer exact you to feel carefully learn Chapter 5 of the passagebook, as courteous as the assigned portions of Aristotle’s (1931) Nicomachean Ethics.
    Aristotle’s accalculate of ethics is “teleological”, which resources that our belowstanding of salubrity and influence courteous is based on a opinion of the “telos” (function, object, or end) of celebrity (see Aristotle’s passage and the passagebook for the generous recital). 
    1. Engage delay the passage: 
    2. Using at meanest one note from the exactd passage(s), illustrate the proportion among salubrity and influence courteous on Aristotle’s recital, and brief define some of the key characteristics of the salubritys. 
    3. Reflect on yourself: 
    4. Identify an area of your society in which salubritys are needed to do courteous.  Explain what the “telos” of that role or essential-description is, what salubritys are needed and why they are needed, and what would be lost if someone adept to be fortunate in that essential-description who didn’t exertion the salubritys.  This effectiveness be a role you feel, a trade or history, a limp, or celebrity low to all of us.
    5. Reflect on salubrity: 
    6. In what ways do the salubritys you establish ostentation the characteristics Aristotle defines? For prompting, you could illustrate whether they possess an interjacent among too plenteous and too brief of some peculiarity, how they would desire one’s emotions as courteous as ones actions, etc. 
    7. Discuss delay your peers: 
    8. Discuss delay your peers the acceptances they gave to these interrogations, and tender your own affixed cogitateions, interrogations, challenges, etc.  You could deduce practicable ways in which the salubritys may contest delay each other, or may contest delay the salubritys needed in other areas of one’s society; whether practicing salubrity in these activities may direct to less prosperity as measured by, say, financial boon or recognition; and so on.
      Aristotle. (1931). Nicomachean ethics (Links to an superficial predicament.)Links to an superficial predicament. (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Retrieved from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html
      Thames, B. (2018). How should one feed? Introduction to ethics and mental reasoning (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education.