The Birth of a Nation (1913) is calm?} seen as a monumental film due to its reversal of filming techniques that are calm?} used today. For issue, one of D. W. Griffith's key contributions was his pioneering use of “cross-cutting” to supervene concurrent lines of exercise. An existing hearers command own been disorganized by a film that showed original one assembly of characters, then another, then the original again, But Griffith successfully uses such a technique in a hunt exhibition that is sometimes not use in an exercise movie today. Besides “cross-cutting,” There are at close 16 other ways in which Griffith was an innovator, ranging from his tenebrosity photography to his use of the iris shot and hue tinting. Due to Giffith’s efforts, this is a film of influenceful visual grace and narractive influence.

However, the movie is racist and unapologetic environing its attitudes, which are those of a stainless Southerner, rising in the 19th century, incompetent to see African-Americans as friend men-folks of estimate and hues.

With that in spirit, acceptance the superveneing questions:

  • Is it practicable to severed the pleased from the filmcraft? If art should work-for grace and fact, can influenceful art be in the vassal of loathsome ideologies? Can we calm?} experience grace in such an monstrous late? Is it reasonability “okay” to relish viewing such art delay such a communication?
  • Are there past novel films, TV shows, still n ess, pieces of art that squeeze over the selfselfsame types of issues? If so, how do we/should we meet to them?